Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's global score of 79. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. They have the same pixel density, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a display with the same size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments, a higher 50 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 12% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.