Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot heavier device than the Google Pixel, but both have the same thickness. The Google Pixel counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than Google Pixel, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a way bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.