Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 overall score. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot newer than Google Pixel 2 XL, it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Google Pixel 2 XL features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot worse pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with way more mega pixels, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a bigger aperture and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 28% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.