Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s 84.7 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is newer than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s, although it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12, providing you some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a bit worse pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.