Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020), having a general score of 87.1 against 87. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a notably newer cellphone than Motorola razr (2020), although it's a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit better amount of pixels per display inch, a little bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.