Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's score of 77.7. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably newer than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, so it offers lots of additional features and optimized performance.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a bit worse pixels count per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit larger display and much more display brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger back camera sensor, a back-facing camera with a better resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.