Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, having a global score of 87.1 against 84.6. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11, so it provides you some nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A22 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a way higher video resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.