Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 overall score. Both of these phones work with the same Android 14 operating system. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design weights the same than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it's a little thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger display, a much brighter display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.