Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A32 LTE Only's global score of 82. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11, providing the user some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a lot brighter display and a little bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera with a much worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a much bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.