Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a 90.8 score against 87.1. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it is just a bit lighter. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit inferior pixel count in each display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bit larger screen. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A51 5G features a battery duration that's very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.