Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 overall score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it was released many years before.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit lower pixel quantity in each inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra count with really similar batteries.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.