Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a score of 92.9 against 87.1. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot older than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's construction is just a bit lighter and a little thinner. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have a same size display, the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater pixel amount in each inch of display. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a camera with much less MP resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW's battery life is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.