Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Galaxy F41, with an 87.1 score against 85.2. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy F41 has Android 11, giving some additional features and enhanced performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is notably newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy F41's, although it is a little bit heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a little lower pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little larger screen and way more brightness. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy F41, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy F41 has better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 33 percent more battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a way lower 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.