Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having an 88.1 score against 87.1. Galaxy F62's body is extremely older, just a little thicker and just a little heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser cpu cores and less RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size screen, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and the same amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has much more brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy F62, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 50 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor and a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.