Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note5's 80.2 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is noticeably newer than Galaxy Note5's, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little lower screen pixel density and a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Galaxy Note5 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, better video frame rate, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.