Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime's 76.9 global score. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features improved battery life than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 36 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a way better 50 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.