Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is just a little bit thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it is a little heavier and was released many years before.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, they both have a same size display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and the Galaxy S10 5G both feature very similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.