Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 global score. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it must be noted that it's also incredibly older, heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 12 GB RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite lower pixel density, a way lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little smaller screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lot tinier sensor capturing way worse quality videos and images and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a back camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.