Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's score of 87.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a incredibly older, a little bit thicker and heavier device than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has much more opaque screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little larger display. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.