Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's score of 87.1. Both of these devices use the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so they should count with very similar OS features. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is much thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bit more display brightness, a little bit bigger display and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's processing unit is just as good as Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's CPU, both of them have 12 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a way higher video resolution and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.