Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Galaxy S5 Plus, with a overall score of 87.1 against 78.1. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot newer than the Galaxy S5 Plus, it is notably heavier and a bit thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version while Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit better looking display than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera with lot more megapixels, a lot larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.