Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's global score of 80.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, providing the user lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better display density. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics co-processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos, a much larger sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 29 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.