Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5, getting a global score of 87.1 against 78.1. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple additional features. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is heavier than the Galaxy XCover 5, it's just a bit thinner and also much newer.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher video quality and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.