Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 81. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, offering lots of additional features and optimized performance. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is noticeably newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little worse pixel number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way better resolution camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.