Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is much older than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's construction is thinner and a bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit less pixels per display inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, they both have a screen of the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.