Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.32 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 3, with an 87.1 score against 85.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer phone than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it is thicker and a little bit heavier. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, they both have a screen of the same size. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a much higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.