Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, with an 87.1 score against 79.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is extremely newer than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium's, but it is just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Xperia XZ Premium has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has much less brightness and a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a lot higher pixels density. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and a larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a really longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.