Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Blasting black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's general score of 87.1. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a much older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a little smaller display, a little worse pixels number per display inch and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.