Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 78.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a notably newer phone, and it's also just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12 version, giving you some nice extra features and increased performance.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro. They have a screen of the same size, an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution and a greater pixel amount per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro both have extremely similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.