Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is incredibly older and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is still a little bit thinner.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lot more opaque display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of display, a little bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video and a way smaller back camera sensor which offers a much worse photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a much better video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.