Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is a lot newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's, although it's a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has way more brightness. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low-light environments.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.