Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's overall score of 86.1. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is a bit thicker but just a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11, so it gives some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a just a little inferior pixel number per inch of screen and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a much worse 50 MP resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.