Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.32 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 77.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the same screen pixel density and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has much more brightness. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra count with very similar processors, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has a lot less MP camera in the back, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has only 256 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.