Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| -- | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having an 80.2 score against 73.4. Google Pixel counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a much smaller screen. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 lesser CPU cores and less RAM. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a way larger sensor taking much better quality photos and videos and a lot better resolution back camera.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.