Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 439 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a overall score of 80 against 73.4. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Google Pixel 3 has a much better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and a back camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 106% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.