Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| -- | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| -- | 443 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's general score of 73.4. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Google Pixel 4 features a much better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little smaller screen.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.