Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| -- | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 general score. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs and a much more megapixels camera.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.