Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| -- | 444 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's score of 73.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Google Pixel 4a counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 4a has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.