Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| -- | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| -- | 416 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's score of 73.4. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.