Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| -- | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| -- | 430 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's score of 73.4. The Google Pixel 5 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.