Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 global score. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. HTC One M9 counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a much smaller screen.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. HTC One M9 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low light situations, a way larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with a way better 50 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.