Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-05-18 |
| -- | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a 77.6 score against 73.4. The HTC U11 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The HTC U11 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way higher resolution back camera.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.