Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-06-01 |
| -- | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 563 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with an 81 score against 73.4. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15, counting with a couple nice extra features. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has way more opaque screen and a little bit smaller screen. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a really longer battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.