Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-03-09 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's overall score of 73.4. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and increased performance.
LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG V30S ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little smaller display. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a very superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.