Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having an 81.3 score against 73.4. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V35 ThinQ features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a greater memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a way better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.