Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 73.4. The LG Velvet features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG Velvet has a much better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a higher 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
The LG Velvet features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much better battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.