Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-03-02 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a global score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy A30 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy A30, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.