Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-27 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 general score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A31 has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a way better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A31, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a much better video definition and a back-facing camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.