Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-02-25 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 score. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display and way less brightness. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a way lower resolution camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.