Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2024-03-11 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 390 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, getting a 79.4 score against 73.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A35 5G has the older 14 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller display and much lower brightness. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a 50 mega-pixels and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a way larger sensor.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much better memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.